Cadman Instead of What?
There is a theory out there that Mr. H. is trying to deflect attention away from something by re-igniting a debate on Cadman, which on appearance is silly because clearly they were up to something with Mr. Cadman. That means then that what they are covering up must be even worse than the alleged bribery. I return to the recent Star articles and my previous posts on Naftagate. Obama has just won the Democratic leadership - if Mr. H. wants to continue to try and interfere in Americans' choice of their next president, maybe he doesn't want the direct role the PMO already appears to have played in the election process of another country to become a major issue. I must say I am very surprised that the Star stories have not received more play.
posted by Susan at 7:49 AM
2 Comments:
How can you be surprised that the Star stories have not recieved more "play"?
Harper has already admitted that Cadman was offered reimbursement for election campaign money.
The tape was doctored. That's obvious.
The question should be why the Liberals are using a tape that they knew was doctored.
Harper is suing the already broke Liberals for 2.5 milllion and according to the Globe editorial today, he is going to get every cent.
And he should.
I think you missed my point. Harper is pushing Cadman back on to the front pages to cover up Nafatgate!!
Post a Comment
<< Home